Showing posts with label Finchem. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Finchem. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Fixing the LPGA in Plain English


We interrupt the loud buzz accompanying the NFL, BCS, MLB, NBA, NHL and PGA to bring you the following message on behalf of the, gulp, LPGA:
H-E-L-P!

Quit snickering.

The Ladies Professional Golf Association is at a dangerous crossroads.
Sadly, this wouldn't be the first time this tour with no sense of itself, sat idling off the sports radar screen while trying to decide how it can become more than just some blip.

You do have to wonder, though, how many times they can arrive at this same, old, tired destination before the dented business model that has been driving their product, just up and quits for good.

Make no mistake about it, these are desperate times for the ladies, and we're not talking about housewives here. And if times like these call for desperate measures, we're ready to suggest some help. But before answering desperation's call, consider a few of the major issues the tour is facing right now:
  • It seems like every minute, the LPGA is losing money and sponsors at a time we are suffering through some of the toughest economic times in the past 100 years. Encouraging investment in a product that has traditionally offered minimal returns will be no easy sell.
  • Currently, the tour is rudderless, 'operating' without a commissioner. Sadly, some of the biggest noise the LPGA made this year was when a group of its better-known unknown players organized a coup that led to the resignation of then-commissioner Carolyn Bivens. Worse, all this was done on the eve of the tour's marquee event, the U.S. Open. That would be the definition of a public-relations nightmare
  • The tour is an afterthought on network TV. Yes, it does a have a 10-year contract with the Golf Channel, which was probably some of the best work Bivens did, but this will do little to establish a more sweeping brand.
  • The tour seems to be constantly at odds with itself about how far it should go in playing the sex-appeal card. Like it or not, some of its more recognized players have the legs to match their good-lookin' games. And like it or not, many people are tuning in to watch just because of that. Yet the LPGA players as a group can't seem to make up their minds about whether this is a good thing. Hint: It's a good thing.
  • Then there is the Korean issue, and we're not talking nukes. For better or worse, the South Korean players have made a tremendous impact on the game. But for worse, they have driven away fans and viewers in droves. Fans complain mostly that the South Korean's nondescript manner on and off the course is, for lack of a better word, boring. This would be a case where winning isn't everything, and these talented Korean players certainly do more than their fair share of that.
So what to do?
Get the biggest, roundest table you can find. Gather 'round that big table the most diverse group of top business and marketing experts in the world you can find. Throw in some LPGA notables, past and present, invite Tim Finchem the successful PGA commissioner, and finally, send invites to representatives from companies that sell products across every demographic you can think of -- from perfume to beer; from nachos to brie; from skirts to ties.

Then throw every single topic you can think of on top of that big, round table -- including, and maybe even mostly, the sensitive Korean issue -- and start sorting through all of them with one goal: Identifying what you are going to sell.

For the past 25 years or so, better known as the post-Nancy Lopez years (See? You remember her don't you?!), it seems like the LPGA has been trying to sell this...then that... then the other thing... and they were getting very few buyers for any of it.

Most perplexing, when they stumbled on something that would sell, they closed the shop.
Maybe the best example of this is when Annika Sorenstam and then Michelle Wie were occasionally teeing it up with the men. Some saw this as a good idea, some saw it as a bad one. No matter how you saw it, though, there was no denying it was good for business, and helped grow the LPGA brand. But the tour discouraged this.

Why in the world would the LPGA be reticent to see any of its members soaking up some of the PGA Tour's brilliant spotlight?

Be bold.
If there are attractive women out there who are able to hit a drive 275 yards dead down the middle, embrace it, don't begrudge it. Sex sells, and it has been selling in every single professional men's sport for decades.

Lopez is one of the four or five greatest women's players of all time. But when you think about her it's more than all that winning she did that you remember her for. No, you remember that she did all that winning while flashing her trademark million-watt smile. And that's a bad thing?

Isn't Arnold Palmer remembered for the very same thing? When Arnie burst on the scene, hitched up those trousers and stalked the course, it wasn't just golf he was selling -- or what the ladies were buying...

Identify your stars and sell 'em. Well after Palmer had stopped all his winning, he was still the best thing the tour had to offer. Arnie wasn't golf's greatest winner, but to this day, he is still known as The King.

Which leads us to the delicate South Korea issue.

Quit treating it delicately. It is a real issue, and it isn't going away.
One of Bivens' greatest undoings was her ill-fated attempt to suspend foreign-born players (i.e. the South Koreans) who could not converse in English. Even is she was a bit hasty (OK a lot hasty) about breaking out the stick ahead of the carrot, she was on to something.

Bivens' contention was that if a player could not speak any English, they were less attractive to those all-important pro-ams that boost stature and raise money for the tour. And if players were unable to promote what sponsors were selling, they were going to bolt to sports with players that could.

Of course, it also doesn't help that these players do rotten interviews. If the public can't get to know the players, identify with them, and get some idea of what makes them tick, they might as well be putting visors on swing machines and wheeling 'em around the course.

At least 75 percent of golf is played between the ears, so if you can't tell us what you were thinking about before stiffing that 5-iron from a 175 yards into a right-to-left wind on No. 18, you've been of no help at all.

Address this issue and address it honestly already.

Finally, go down the road less traveled this time when hiring a commissioner, because if you go down that same, old tired path you've been traveling yet again, you'll be lucky if all you hit is a crossroad.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Please fix the FedEx already!

Because we believe in straight talk and candor in the Grill Room, the management feels compelled to warn you that this column is mostly about golf's FedEx Cup.
Who says we don't look after you around here, eh?

To those of you brave enough to stick this one out, let's move on...

Yes, golf's version of the 'playoffs' has improved. The gods of Ponte Vedra Beach actually managed to make the confounding format a little more compelling and comprehensible this year.

And, yes again, the result of any championship system (sorry, Commissioner Finchem, this is a points race, not a playoff), no matter how wacky, should be to determine the best player or team when it is all over.

Well, right now Tiger Woods is leading the FedEx race, and even if he took an 0-for-4 in this year's majors, is still undeniable the game's best player by about the length of a solidly struck 3-wood.

Further, if you've been watching any of the FedEx tournaments the last three weeks, you'll notice all the big names are still playing -- Ernie, Phil, Sergio, Padraig, etc.
This might be the system's biggest caveat, because before the FedEx came along, chasing these guys away from their mansions and onto the golf course in September was like coaxing a smile from Tiger.

So the FedEx has accomplished some of the things it set out to do.

But how many of you out there brave enough to still be reading this column understand the FedEx Cup? Come on, let's see a show of hands. Put your hand down, commissioner.
Really? Nobody?

Me either -- and neither do many of the players.

Trust me, if a certified golf geek like myself can't walk you through this, it's broken, and not worth my time, or yours, to explain. If you really, really want to try to understand the rules, read this, but please return -- all three of you.

The fix

Assuming you're back, we have a suggestion to make this thing a snap to understand and most likely even more compelling to watch: Get rid of the points, and base the thing strictly on golf results. You know, like under par and over par, and all that?

The player with the lowest cumulative score after the final four events and 16 rounds of golf wins. Period.

Oh, I suppose you could keep the points system throughout the season. That is pretty easy to understand. The better you finish in a tournament the more points you get. The better you play over the course of the year, the more points you earn.

But once you get to golf's version of the Final Four, start anew and dump the points.

Let's say the top 80 point-earners of the year earn a spot into the first of the Fedex Cup's final four events.
After the first week of action, you drop the bottom 20, and 60 players move onto the second stop. There would be no cuts.
Most important, their scores carry over from the previous tournament.

After the second event you drop another 20, and the remaining 40 players and their cumulative scores from the previous two tournaments play on.
After the third event you drop another 20, until you are left with the top-20 players based on scoring from the previous three stops, not points.

Could there be flaws in this system? Absolutely. The biggest might be if, golf gods forbid, Tiger shot his way out of it with a horrible first or second tournament.
Certainly, some top players would fall victim to this new format each year. But if you can't crack the top 60 out of 80, or 40 out of 60, you don't deserve a shot at a championship anyway, right?

And if these stars managed to scrape by into the next tournament, they'd have a chance to move up the leaderboard over the next four rounds.

Of course, there would also be the possibility of a run-away. Some dude named Tiger could play out of his mind and go into the final weekend with a 16-shot lead or something. Even if that happened, you couldn't deny the fact that the tour had identified the best player. And 16-shot lead or not, TV loves Tiger.

No, we see nothing but upside to this suggestion, and, most important: everybody would understand the dang thing.

Lip-outs...

There's been a lot made this past week in the golf world about Greg Norman using one of his two captain's picks on countryman Adam Scott for the looming Presidents Cup competition, Oct. 8-11, at San Francisco's Harding Park.

The choice, and the fact Norman never allegedly even gave him a courtesy call, irked one Rory Sabbatini.

While the haughty Shark has always battled a chip on his shoulder disguised as a fin, I'm not sure what other choice he had here.

Yes, Scott had a horrendous season, tumbling 50 places to No. 53 in the world rankings, and even allegedly conceded he should have been left off the team.

But when Sabbatini's your next best option you have no other option. Sabbatini hasn't exactly been tearing it up, either, and sits at No. 41 in the world rankings. He has not finished in the top 30 of any event since his victory in the Byron Nelson Championship in May.

And if it came down to a tie-breaker between the two in Norman's mind, then he no doubt gave the nod to Scott, who is very well-liked by his fellow players. Sabbatini...er, not so much.
In a team event camaraderie is crucial.

Norman should get kudos for nabbing Japan's 17-year-old golfing sensation, Ryo Ishikawa, with his other pick. If one of the major aims of this event is to generate interest around the world, capturing the golf-crazy Japanese market is key. Most important, this kid can flat play.

On the U.S. side, captain Fred Couples nabbed this year's U.S. Open champ Lucas Glover, and last year's Ryder Cup stalwart Hunter Mahan, surprising no one.
A case could have been made for either Brian Gay or Dustin Johnson. Both have won twice over the last calendar year.

Still, Couples called the choice of Mahan "a no-brainer."

Maybe, but one thing's for sure, with the emergence of its younger guns, the U.S. suddenly has a very deep roster of players to choose from.

A look at the teams:
International:
Geoff Ogilvy, Vijay Singh, Camilo Villegas, Retief Goosen, Ernie Els, Angel Cabrera, Mike Weir, Robert Allenby, Yang, Tim Clark, Adam Scott, and Ryo Ishikawa.

U.S.:
Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson, Steve Stricker, Jim Furyk, Kenny Perry, Zach Johnson, Stewart Cink, Sean O'Hair, Anthony Kim, Justin Leonard, Lucas Glover, and Hunter Mahan.